Braden Shick vs Ko Suzuki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Oct at 02:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Shick vs K. Suzuki

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Shick 1 - 0 Suzuki
They have played 2 sets in total, with Braden Shick winning 2 and Ko Suzuki winning 0. The last match between Braden Shick and Ko Suzuki was at the M15 Yanagawa City, 31-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Braden Shick getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Shick | 1 | 
| Suzuki | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Yanagawa City(10-31-25)
B. Shick vs K. Suzuki H2H Profile
B. Shick vs K. Suzuki Match Preview:
- Braden Shick has demonstrated stronger second serve performance, winning 46.30% of points compared to Ko Suzuki's 41.15% over the last six months. Could this give Shick an edge in maintaining service games? It appears likely.
- In terms of return games, Suzuki excels by winning 48.43% of second serve return points, while Shick manages 41.48%. This suggests Suzuki's strengths might lie in exploiting opponents' serves.
- When facing first serves, Suzuki edges out Shick slightly with a return success rate of 26.97% against 24.82%. Could returning prowess translate into breaking opportunities? It's worth considering.
- Both players show resilience under pressure. Shick has saved 49.70% of breakpoints, closely matched by Suzuki's 50.00%. Could this stalemate suggest a tightly contested match? Quite possibly.
- During the last year, Shick boasts a superior win rate of 59.38% compared to Suzuki's 50.00%. Does this overarching success hint at a consistent advantage for Shick? It seems so.
- Clay surfaces bring out the best in both players, each securing a 67% win rate. However, Shick holds a slightly better record on hard courts, suggesting versatility on multiple surfaces.
- At the $10K tournament level, Shick's win rate is 64.29%, surpassing Suzuki's 50.00%. Does playing against possibly tougher opponents give Suzuki an edge? It's a nuanced point.
- Shick often faces competitors with an average rank of 313.78, while Suzuki matches up against higher-ranked players with an average of 176.37. Could the additional challenge strengthen Suzuki's competitive edge? Perhaps.
- In deciding set scenarios across the past year, Shick triumphs 38% of the time, compared to Suzuki's 30%. Could this slight difference influence a potential final-set showdown? There's a reason to believe it might.
Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the key performance indicators for both players, Braden Shick appears to possess notable advantages in second serve performance, overall match win rate, and thriving under pressure in deciding sets. These aspects weigh heavily in his favor in this upcoming match.
While Ko Suzuki demonstrates proficiency in returning serves and consistently competing against higher-ranked opponents, the current statistics align more closely with Shick emerging as the likely victor.
Considering these factors and the breadth of Shick's strengths, Braden Shick is predicted to win this match.
Braden Shick vs Ko Suzuki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Shick vs K. Suzuki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 3 | 
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 | 
| 1:5:40 | Average Match Time | 1:5:40 | 
| 54% (31/57) | 1st Serve % | 72% (28/39) | 
| 77% (24/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) | 
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (4/11) | 
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/4) | 
| 54% (21/39) | Return Points Win % | 32% (18/57) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
B. Shick Recent Matches Played
K. Suzuki Recent Matches Played

B. Shick vs K. Suzuki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.53% (42/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.58% (153/138) | 
| 57.69% (90/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.11% (342/302) | 
| 53.70% (777/670) | Games Win/Loss | 51.59% (3053/2865) | 
| 55.36% (31/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.45% (107/97) | 
| 66.67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.06% (36/26) | 
| 63.64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (10/15) | 
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 | 
| 207 | Aces Total | 115 | 
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 | 
| 112 | Total Double Faults | 242 | 
| 1:3:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 286.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 351.74 | 
| 57% (1691/2947) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4159/6213) | 
| 70% (1178/1691) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2640/4159) | 
| 50% (633/1256) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (966/2054) | 
| 44% (116/265) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (254/587) | 
| 38% (1089/2851) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2362/5963) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 16.67% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 38.89% (7/11) | 
| 62.12% (41/25) | Futures W/L | 53.48% (146/127) | 
| 58% (41/71) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (150/288) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 50% (10/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (27/49) | 
| 42% (5/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (25/63) | 
| 93% (42/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (158/140) | 
| 7% (42/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (158/18) | 
| 10% (31/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (133/13) | 












